Skip to content

Critique Clinic – March 9-11, 2012

March 9, 2012

How does it work? For three days a week (Friday-Sunday midnight), I will open the clinic to any artist who wants an honest peer review and critique of a card which gets plenty of clicks but no sales, so something’s probably not quite right, or you’ve got a new design you want to test drive, or you’re unsure about the marketability of a card. Or perhaps you’re a newbie who isn’t sure if a recently submitted card is up to a marketable standard. Anyone is welcome to participate. In fact, I encourage everyone to at least look at the cards in question and read the critique comments – you may learn something. The purpose of the clinic is to help artists improve the commercial appeal and marketability of their cards.

THE RULES

  • ONE card per artist only.
  • Card must be for sale at Greeting Card Universe.
  • We will take an unlimited number of artists, including those who have submitted recently, HOWEVER I reserve the right to close a clinic for the day if the submissions become overwhelming. If the clinic has been closed, and you submit a card, your comment will be deleted.
  • To submit a card for critique,ย post a link to the cardย in the comments section of this clinic post. Allowances will be made if you’ve had a card declined, or made a new design you’d like advice on. Give us the link where we can see the card, such as your private gallery, Flickr, etc.
  • Any artist is free to comment and/or give a critique of a submitted card. HOWEVER, post-and-run comments like “great card” or “you suck” will not be tolerated, nor will abuse. Criticism should be constructive, not destructive. Play nice or you will be banned.
  • I also won’t tolerate temper tantrums if you decide your “artistic integrity” is being stepped on because you asked for a critique, and someone told you the photo you’re using isn’t in focus. If you can’t take honest criticism, don’t submit. Once gets you a warning; twice and you’re banned from submitting in the future.
  • Artists who critique may do so by giving their opinion, posting an example of another card, or pointing the submitter to a video, on-line article, or other helpful suggestion.
  • Don’t forget that artists who are giving you tips and helpful advice are volunteering their time and trouble. Be nice. A link back to their store on your website or blog is appreciated (but not mandatory).
  • You are free not to take any advice offered. There’s no guarantee any card will be a bestseller, so don’t come into the clinic with unrealistic expectations.
  • Rules may change as we go along and we see how things turn out, okay?

So without any further ado, I declare this week’s Critique Clinic open!

14 Comments leave one →
  1. CindyJ's avatar
    March 9, 2012 2:19 pm

    Hi Corrie and Everybody!

    It’s been awhile. Pinterest is starting to take up a lot of my time now (I can’t help it!). Lol.

    Here’s my card today. I just created it yesterday, so it’s still pending. This one is in my private gallery.

    http://artist.greetingcarduniverse.com/greeting-card-911407/?aid=152495

    I used some cool filters in Inkscape, and on my computer screen this design has a holographic look to it (which I thought was pretty neat). I was wondering how it looks to you? Also, the inside poem… does it work?

    Thanks!!! ๐Ÿ™‚
    Cindy

  2. GCUAdmin's avatar
    March 9, 2012 2:33 pm

    Cindy, it’s certainly colorful! I was having flashbacks to the 60’s. That being said, the card looks fine (thought I don’t see the holographic effect you were talking about). Have you considered doing it on a white background? That might make the design elements stand out a little more and the colors look a little fresher.

    Corrie

    • CindyJ's avatar
      March 9, 2012 3:57 pm

      Thanks, Corrie. Here it is with nothing changed except the background (to white):
      http://artist.greetingcarduniverse.com/greeting-card-911441/?aid=152495

      I think some of the text borders get a little washed out now and it would take a considerable amount of time for me to change them all to something darker. ๐Ÿ˜ฆ That’s because when I use filters it really slows my computer down. ๐Ÿ˜ฆ Ack!

      Thanks,
      Cindy

  3. GCUAdmin's avatar
    March 9, 2012 4:29 pm

    Now that I see it, black was a better choice. The different colored borders don’t seem so obvious, and it’s easier to read with the busy pattern in the letters.

    Corrie

    • CindyJ's avatar
      March 9, 2012 6:22 pm

      Thanks Corrie! ๐Ÿ™‚

      • Doreen/Salon of Art's avatar
        March 10, 2012 4:48 pm

        You might also, if possible in your software, try a black stroke (outline) on the letters and elements and see how that looks on the white background. That effect would also blend well with the ’70’s’ look of the image. Just a thought ๐Ÿ™‚

      • CindyJ's avatar
        March 10, 2012 9:12 pm

        Yes, I tried that Doreen. Here it is:
        HappyMDWhitewithBlackOutline

        I’m not sure if I like it, though, because the original stroke borders on the text components and the hearts might have been of differing pixel sizes; and to remove all of the filtering and go back and fix them and then put the filters back on would take me forever (cause my puter’s so slow with filters).

        I’m going to order a copy of this card with the black background in a few days so I can see how it looks in print. ๐Ÿ™‚

        Thanks!
        Cindy

      • Doreen/Salon of Art's avatar
        March 10, 2012 10:53 pm

        Hi Cindy, well I’m with you and Corrie, the black is definitely better. What bothers me and may cause you a bit of an issue is that on the black they look almost a bit blurry. Maybe a crisp white stroke for the letters/elements on black would fix that. It may just be something I notice and no one else does . . .LOL! Good luck with your card, it’s a fun design!

  4. Sharon McKee's avatar
    March 10, 2012 1:08 am

    Hello! I am very new to GCU, and I certainly would welcome any feedback on the first card that I have designed and presented in my store. Thank you very much for the critique, and I look forward to having my other cards hopefully approved!

    http://www.greetingcarduniverse.com/holiday-cards/easter-cards/general-easter/happy-easter-bunny-slippers-910789?aid=189194

    Here is the link to my Happy Easter Bunny Slippers card.

    Thanks!
    Sharon

    • GCUAdmin's avatar
      March 10, 2012 7:08 am

      Those bunny slippers are adorable! And I think the inside text is good, too. You should have a seller on your hands, but it will probably take a while. I’ve found it can take up to 2 or 3 years before a new design begins to sell well unless you do some marketing. Just keep designing and you’ll do fine. ๐Ÿ™‚

      Corrie

      • Sharon McKee's avatar
        March 10, 2012 4:37 pm

        Thank you, Corrie, for the encouraging words. I am not sure exactly how to market yet, but am learning a lot just by navigating around the GCU wiki site, looking at other stores and how they do things, and other various lenses and instructional sites. Thanks for putting so much help out there for us–it definitely is a little bewildering just starting out!

        I just know that I love to draw and it is fun to have someplace to share the artwork!

        Sharon

    • Doreen/Salon of Art's avatar
      March 10, 2012 4:50 pm

      Welcome Sharon! Very cute card and I wish you luck at GCU!
      Doreen

      • Sharon McKee's avatar
        March 10, 2012 5:12 pm

        Aw, thanks, Doreen! I was just looking at your GCU store yesterday. Very impressive; your images are stunning!

        I appreciate your warm welcome…
        Sharon

    • CindyJ's avatar
      March 10, 2012 9:05 pm

      Yes, that card is quite adorable…and I suspect if it is an indication of your art skills, in general, then I’ll likely be posting some of your cards as Design of the Day winners in future. ๐Ÿ™‚

      Great first card, Sharon! Glad you found GCU. ๐Ÿ™‚

      Cindy

Leave a comment