Skip to content

Critique Clinic – July 6-7, 2013

July 6, 2013

How does it work? For three days a week (Friday-Sunday midnight), I will open the clinic to any artist who wants an honest peer review and critique of a card which gets plenty of clicks but no sales, so something’s probably not quite right, or you’ve got a new design you want to test drive, or you’re unsure about the marketability of a card. Or perhaps you’re a newbie who isn’t sure if a card is up to a marketable standard. Anyone is welcome to participate. In fact, I encourage everyone to at least look at the cards in question and read the critique comments – you may learn something. The purpose of the clinic is to help artists improve the commercial appeal and marketability of their cards.

THE RULES

  • ONE card per artist only.
  • Card must be intended for sale at Greeting Card Universe.
  • To submit a card for critique, post a link to the card at GCU in the comments section of this clinic post. Allowances will be made if you’ve had a card declined, or made a new design you’d like advice on before submission. Give us the link where we can see the card, such as your private gallery, Flickr, Tinypic, etc. If you do give a private gallery link, be sure your private module gallery is ON. Please do not post links to your Manage Cards section – do you really want strangers tinkering with your cards? And please don’t ask us to critique a card that’s pending review – we can’t see it until it’s approved.
  • Any artist is free to comment and/or give a critique of a submitted card. HOWEVER, post-and-run comments like “great card” or “you suck” will not be tolerated, nor will abuse. Criticism should be constructive, not destructive. Play nice or you will be banned.
  • I also won’t tolerate temper tantrums if you decide your “artistic integrity” is being stepped on because you asked for a critique, and someone told you the photo you’re using isn’t in focus. If you can’t take honest criticism, don’t submit. Once gets you a warning; twice and you’re banned from submitting in the future.
  • Artists who critique may do so by giving their opinion, posting an example of another card, or pointing the submitter to a video, on-line article, or other helpful suggestion.
  • Don’t forget that artists who are giving you tips and helpful advice are volunteering their time and trouble. Be nice. A link back to their store on your website or blog is appreciated (but not mandatory).
  • You are free not to take any advice offered. There’s no guarantee any card will be a bestseller, so don’t come into the clinic with unrealistic expectations.
  • Rules may change as we go along and we see how things turn out, okay?

So without any further ado, I declare this week’s Critique Clinic open!

4 Comments leave one →
  1. Steppeland's avatar
    July 6, 2013 4:08 pm

    Hi, all, I have been waiting for this opportunity of the critique clinique to enter a card that I would really like to receive advise on. It’s this card Product ID:
    1111888 that I originally made for the customers request here http://www.greetingcarduniverse.com/forum/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1371588970 .
    The card has been returned for first edits, because the bouquet originally was too large compared with the shoes, and the edges of the bouquet were out of focus, and not in line with the shoes.
    So I made the bouquet smaller by deleting the out of focus flowers at the edge, and extended the rock in order to place the bouquet next to the shoes. As it is now, it looks definitely better than it was before, but I’m still not fully happy about it.
    After second review, the card was approved, but the reviewer wrote in the comment: “‘The changes you made to the bouquet were an improvement but we felt the bouquet still had the look of being an ‘added item’. […] . If you feel you want to play with the bouquet further, we have no hesitation in saying feel free to make further edits… ‘” –
    I do agree that the bouquet is still not completely how it should be, but I just have no idea what I should try and do about it… Is it a little too small now, compared to the shoes, should I enlarge it and skew it more somehow… but then, how?
    Any suggestions about it would be very welcome. And of course, I’m open for any further critique on this card, and any ideas on how it could be improved.
    Thank you so much for giving it a shot!

    • GCUAdmin's avatar
      July 6, 2013 4:14 pm

      Okay, first, I want to post the URL of the card to make it easier for people to find it:

      http://www.greetingcarduniverse.com/congratulations-cards/wedding-marriage/sports-specific/mountain-hiking-shoes-and-bouquet-1111888

      I kind of get what the reviewers were talking about … to my eye, neither the bouquet nor the shoes look as if they were actually there when the landscape picture was taken. I don’t know why. Perhaps someone with more expertise in photography can give you some advice.

      Corrie

    • Salon of Art's avatar
      July 6, 2013 7:09 pm

      I believe it’s the feeling that the perspective off which is causing this to not sit well with the viewer. The shoes feel as if they are going to fall right out of the image. You might try two things, first I’d use a bouquet of yellow sunflowers or daisies … something more ‘country and hand-picked’, as well as visibly brighter so they become a part of the overall ‘theme’. Secondly, I’d try putting the new hand-picked flower bouquet in “her” shoes. The height of doing this may just be enough to pull the viewers eye away from the ‘falling shoe syndrome’ 🙂 It’s a good image to work with, but I too understand what the reviewers are getting at. May may also want to see what it looks like to put those wedding rings on the shoe lace bow.

      My thoughts for what they are worth. Doreen

  2. Steppeland's avatar
    July 8, 2013 9:56 am

    Thank you Corrie and Doreen for your replies. Doreen, I do understand your suggestions and think they would work better indeed. Sad thing is that it means redoing the photo of the shoes, which I’m not able to right now, since I’m back from vacation, and as well the shoes as the rock on which I placed them are far away now. I could go for a hand picked bouquet of wildflowers and put it next to the shoes somehow, trying to place it in a better perspective – and the rings, again, I first would to have to get hold of some, and then photoshop them into the shoes pic somehow, which probably also is beyond my technical capacities. Anyway, I do value your suggestions, and may give it another try by occasion some time soon 🙂
    Thank you!

Leave a comment