Skip to content

Critique Clinic – January 27-29, 2012

January 27, 2012

How does it work? For three days a week (Friday-Sunday midnight), I will open the clinic to any artist who wants an honest peer review and critique of a card which gets plenty of clicks but no sales, so something’s probably not quite right, or you’ve got a new design you want to test drive, or you’re unsure about the marketability of a card. Or perhaps you’re a newbie who isn’t sure if a recently submitted card is up to a marketable standard. Anyone is welcome to participate. In fact, I encourage everyone to at least look at the cards in question and read the critique comments – you may learn something. The purpose of the clinic is to help artists improve the commercial appeal and marketability of their cards.

THE RULES

  • ONE card per artist only.
  • Card must be for sale at Greeting Card Universe.
  • We will take an unlimited number of artists, including those who have submitted recently, HOWEVER I reserve the right to close a clinic for the day if the submissions become overwhelming. If the clinic has been closed, and you submit a card, your comment will be deleted.
  • To submit a card for critique, post a link to the card at GCU in the comments section of this clinic post. Allowances will be made if you’ve had a card declined, or a new design you’d like advice on. Just give us a link where we can see the card, such as your private gallery, Flickr, etc.
  • Any artist is free to comment and/or give a critique of a submitted card. HOWEVER, post-and-run comments like “great card” or “you suck” will not be tolerated, nor will abuse. Criticism should be constructive, not destructive. Play nice or you will be banned.
  • I also won’t tolerate temper tantrums if you decide your “artistic integrity” is being stepped on because you asked for a critique, and someone told you the photo you’re using isn’t in focus. If you can’t take honest criticism, don’t submit. Once gets you a warning; twice and you’re banned from submitting in the future.
  • Artists who critique may do so by giving their opinion, posting an example of another card, or pointing the submitter to a video, on-line article, or other helpful suggestion.
  • Don’t forget that artists who are giving you tips and helpful advice are volunteering their time and trouble. Be nice. A link back to their store on your website or blog is appreciated (but not mandatory).
  • You are free not to take any advice offered. There’s no guarantee any card will be a bestseller, so don’t come into the clinic with unrealistic expectations.
  • Rules may change as we go along and we see how things turn out, okay?

So without any further ado, I declare this week’s Critique Clinic open!

8 Comments leave one →
  1. CindyJ's avatar
    January 29, 2012 1:51 am

    Hi Corrie and Everybody!

    Here’s one that I made yesterday (kind of late for a Valentine this year, but it’ll be ready for next year).

    http://artist.greetingcarduniverse.com/greeting-card-898793/?aid=152495

    My hubby and son said they thought it was kind of hard to read, so I figure if I need to make changes – I can do so before it gets to the reviewer (with the hopes it will reach the level of a ‘virtually perfect submission’ ) 🙂

    Also, I didn’t use the word ‘military’ in there anywhere (other than in the Artist’s Notes). Will I get dinged by the reviewer for that, or does the concept make it clear enough?

    Thanks!
    Cindy

    • GCUAdmin's avatar
      January 29, 2012 7:32 am

      Hi Cindy!

      I agree with your husband and son – the word “Heroes” on the front is almost impossible to read. If you’re going to decorate a font like that, you need a fatter one in a very plain text style that will allow for graphics inside the letters and still be readable.

      If you had put this card in a “Military” Valentine’s category (is there such a thing?) you’d probably get the card returned because an “American hero” isn’t the same as specific soldier, sailor, Marine, etc. I can’t see what category it’s in right now – GCU is being temperamental.

      Corrie

    • CindyJ's avatar
      January 29, 2012 3:47 pm

      Thanks Corrie!
      Sorry I didn’t mention what categories I had put this card in (and the link I gave you is to the card in my private gallery – so that wouldn’t tell you much, duh. Lol!). Here are the 2 categories, but I will be changing things based on your comments (which I REALLY appreciate!), hopefully in time so the reviewer doesn’t have to return it to me for edits. 😉

      Collections » Patriotic » United States / U.S.
      Holidays » Valentine’s Day » Occupation Specific » Armed Forces / Military Service

      Thanks again! 🙂
      Cindy

  2. Dragonfire Graphics's avatar
    January 29, 2012 2:06 pm

    Happy Sunday Everyone, I would like to submit this card for critique. It has quite a few hits and I did have 3 sales right off the bat but none since. I am wondering if it needs to have something referring to retirement on the front. I don’t know. As I write this it occurs to me this could be used as an old age humor birthday card or a get well. The wheels are suddenly turning! Anyway, just wondering if it needs something.
    as a p.s. this is cropped from my 87 year old Mom’s kindergarten photo in East Orange, NJ.

  3. GCUAdmin's avatar
    January 29, 2012 2:09 pm

    Hey, Betsy, we need a link so we can see your card.

    Corrie

  4. Dragonfire Graphics's avatar
  5. GCUAdmin's avatar
    January 29, 2012 2:29 pm

    Okay, well… maybe it’s just me, but I kind of find it odd that a retirement card has children on it. I like the photo, though. If you could rework that as a humorous birthday card, that would work well.

    Corrie

  6. Dragonfire Graphics's avatar
    January 29, 2012 2:39 pm

    Thanks Corrie, I never thought of that! Back to the drawing board.

Leave a reply to Corrie Cancel reply