Skip to content

Critique Clinic – March 2-4, 2012

March 2, 2012

How does it work? For three days a week (Friday-Sunday midnight), I will open the clinic to any artist who wants an honest peer review and critique of a card which gets plenty of clicks but no sales, so something’s probably not quite right, or you’ve got a new design you want to test drive, or you’re unsure about the marketability of a card. Or perhaps you’re a newbie who isn’t sure if a recently submitted card is up to a marketable standard. Anyone is welcome to participate. In fact, I encourage everyone to at least look at the cards in question and read the critique comments – you may learn something. The purpose of the clinic is to help artists improve the commercial appeal and marketability of their cards.

THE RULES

  • ONE card per artist only.
  • Card must be for sale at Greeting Card Universe.
  • We will take an unlimited number of artists, including those who have submitted recently, HOWEVER I reserve the right to close a clinic for the day if the submissions become overwhelming. If the clinic has been closed, and you submit a card, your comment will be deleted.
  • To submit a card for critique, post a link to the card at GCU in the comments section of this clinic post. Allowances will be made if you’ve had a card declined, or made a new design you’d like advice on. Give us the link where we can see the card, such as your private gallery, Flickr, etc.
  • Any artist is free to comment and/or give a critique of a submitted card. HOWEVER, post-and-run comments like “great card” or “you suck” will not be tolerated, nor will abuse. Criticism should be constructive, not destructive. Play nice or you will be banned.
  • I also won’t tolerate temper tantrums if you decide your “artistic integrity” is being stepped on because you asked for a critique, and someone told you the photo you’re using isn’t in focus. If you can’t take honest criticism, don’t submit. Once gets you a warning; twice and you’re banned from submitting in the future.
  • Artists who critique may do so by giving their opinion, posting an example of another card, or pointing the submitter to a video, on-line article, or other helpful suggestion.
  • Don’t forget that artists who are giving you tips and helpful advice are volunteering their time and trouble. Be nice. A link back to their store on your website or blog is appreciated (but not mandatory).
  • You are free not to take any advice offered. There’s no guarantee any card will be a bestseller, so don’t come into the clinic with unrealistic expectations.
  • Rules may change as we go along and we see how things turn out, okay?

So without any further ado, I declare this week’s Critique Clinic open!

10 Comments leave one →
  1. SunAtNight's avatar
    SunAtNight permalink
    March 2, 2012 7:16 pm

    I’m game for being first today! I’m really focusing on strengthening designs. Something on this card is nagging at me and I can’t quite put my finger on it. Been looking at since December. It just doesn’t seem homogeneous to me (pun intended, ha, ha, ha). The rough basic concept was the milky way, season’s greetings, and of course the business of milk hauling. Any ideas to make this more cohesive?

    Second topic – logo vs. company name. I’ve been encountering more and more businesses who do not have a logo. They are choosing the use of templates (you know the business card printing people advertised on TV) over branding. In light of this trend, in your opinion does the customization of “your logo here” severely limit? Keep the logo customization or change to company name customization. Third option is to delete the customization front all together. Would love to hear your thoughts on this subject.

    http://www.greetingcarduniverse.com/business/christmas/industry-specific/milk-hauling/milk-hauling-truck-stars-881386?aid=145914

    • Doreen/Salon of Art's avatar
      March 2, 2012 8:31 pm

      Hi SunAtNight,

      Corrie will a better help on this card, I will only say that it lacks depth and that alone may be what you see.

      As far as the Logo question, make one of each that’s what I do. Make one like this for a logo insert and then make another without the logo spot, but with personalization for the business name. That way you cover the needs of both:-)

      Doreen

    • GCUAdmin's avatar
      March 3, 2012 6:50 am

      The design is kind of flat. Is that truck clip art? I know you’re working in a 2-D environment, but objects in that environment should look as if they have depth, and the truck is as flat as a banner stretched across the road. If you still have it in layers, you could play around with it a little to try and perk the truck up.

      And Doreen’s advice is sound. 🙂

      Corrie

      • SunAtNight's avatar
        SunAtNight permalink
        March 3, 2012 7:18 am

        Thanks Corrie! No the truck wasn’t clip art. Original, digital vector illustration no photography. I’ll play around with it. Maybe add a shadow underneath the truck onto the road and some other details. But I do have gradients all over that truck, so either the gradients that I do have is so subtle in color that maybe it needs more contrast or I need to reposition the truck and add more perspective to increase depth. I’ll keep working on it.

  2. Gerda with Send2smiles's avatar
    March 3, 2012 4:36 pm

    Nice weekend, everyone,

    Today I submitting one of my first cards, that I uploaded to GCU. The design is in there for boys and girls, but it never sold. (well, I bought it 😉 )
    Any suggestions on this one? Thanks again!,

    Gerda

  3. Gerda's avatar
    March 3, 2012 5:44 pm

    Woops,… Sorry, Didn’t finish my coffee,yet! 🙂
    http://www.greetingcarduniverse.com/congratulations-cards/new-baby/girl/stork-with-baby-girl-640338

  4. Norma's avatar
    Norma permalink
    March 4, 2012 11:27 am

    In the Uk there is a chocolate bar called Milky Way. Please be sure the phrase used in this way is not copyright, I’d hate you to do loads of work then find it is not good! Your truck reminds me of an old advert of theirs.

    • Norma's avatar
      Norma permalink
      March 4, 2012 11:28 am

      Sorry, that comment was for SunatNight!

    • SunAtNight's avatar
      SunAtNight permalink
      March 4, 2012 4:07 pm

      Already done the research, hence the hyphen. I almost didn’t do the concept because of it. Glad to hear that Mars, Inc (the manufacturer of Milky Way) made it over the pond, yummy!. I’m sure if that had it their way would trademark the whole cosmos (ha, ha, ha).

Leave a reply to Gerda with Send2smiles Cancel reply