Skip to content

Critique Clinic – November 1-3, 2013

November 1, 2013

How does it work? For three days a week (Friday-Sunday midnight), I will open the clinic to any artist who wants an honest peer review and critique of a card which gets plenty of clicks but no sales, so something’s probably not quite right, or you’ve got a new design you want to test drive, or you’re unsure about the marketability of a card. Or perhaps you’re a newbie who isn’t sure if a card is up to a marketable standard. Anyone is welcome to participate. In fact, I encourage everyone to at least look at the cards in question and read the critique comments – you may learn something. The purpose of the clinic is to help artists improve the commercial appeal and marketability of their cards.

THE RULES

  • ONE card per artist only.
  • Card must be intended for sale at Greeting Card Universe.
  • To submit a card for critique, post a link to the card at GCU in the comments section of this clinic post. Allowances will be made if you’ve had a card declined, or made a new design you’d like advice on before submission. Give us the link where we can see the card, such as your private gallery, Flickr, Tinypic, etc. If you do give a private gallery link, be sure your private module gallery is ON. Please do not post links to your Manage Cards section – do you really want strangers tinkering with your cards? And please don’t ask us to critique a card that’s pending review – we can’t see it until it’s approved.
  • Any artist is free to comment and/or give a critique of a submitted card. HOWEVER, post-and-run comments like “great card” or “you suck” will not be tolerated, nor will abuse. Criticism should be constructive, not destructive. Play nice or you will be banned.
  • I also won’t tolerate temper tantrums if you decide your “artistic integrity” is being stepped on because you asked for a critique, and someone told you the photo you’re using isn’t in focus. If you can’t take honest criticism, don’t submit. Once gets you a warning; twice and you’re banned from submitting in the future.
  • Artists who critique may do so by giving their opinion, posting an example of another card, or pointing the submitter to a video, on-line article, or other helpful suggestion.
  • Don’t forget that artists who are giving you tips and helpful advice are volunteering their time and trouble. Be nice. A link back to their store on your website or blog is appreciated (but not mandatory).
  • You are free not to take any advice offered. There’s no guarantee any card will be a bestseller, so don’t come into the clinic with unrealistic expectations.
  • Rules may change as we go along and we see how things turn out, okay?

So without any further ado, I declare this week’s Critique Clinic open!

6 Comments leave one →
  1. Susan Eveland's avatar
    Susan Eveland permalink
    November 2, 2013 8:05 pm

    Here’s a card I’m considering submitting but not sure of marketability. You can see the card by signing in to Flickr, then searching for Susan Eveland. Thank you for this opportunity.

    • GCUAdmin's avatar
      November 2, 2013 8:11 pm

      Sorry, I can’t really help you as I don’t have a Flikr account. Can you post a link to the image?

      Corrie

    • Doreen/Salon of Art's avatar
      November 2, 2013 10:42 pm

      I do have a Flickr account and the only image that comes up with a search of your name is a snapshot from community college of alumni? If you can not offer a link to flickr, then please consider uploading the card to your GCU private gallery and give that link here 🙂
      Doreen

  2. Susan Eveland's avatar
    Susan Eveland permalink
    November 2, 2013 11:42 pm

    Here’s a link to the photo. Thank you for your critique.

    IMG_1871
    • Doreen/Salon of Art's avatar
      November 3, 2013 2:58 am

      Hi Susan,

      I’m sorry, but I don’t think this will meet GCU’s Marketability Standards as shown in this link anyway. Photographs for greeting cards really need to make the viewer feel something. This image lacks a connection to the viewing audience. There is no WOW factor; such as dynamic lighting, tonal values, etc., and no real subject matter to draw the eye in to the image. It simply lacks impact in my opinion. I hope this helps you in choosing your greeting cards images 🙂 Good luck!
      Doreen
      http://www.SalonOfArt.com
      http://www.Facebook.com/SalonOfArt

  3. Susan Eveland's avatar
    Susan Eveland permalink
    November 3, 2013 3:00 pm

    Doreen – This does help me to be more selective. Thank you for taking the time to give me your opinion. I appreciate your input. Susan

Leave a reply to Salon of Art Cancel reply