Skip to content

Critique Clinic – April 4-6, 2014

April 4, 2014

How does it work? For three days a week (Friday-Sunday midnight), I will open the clinic to any artist who wants an honest peer review and critique of a card which gets plenty of clicks but no sales, so something’s probably not quite right, or you’ve got a new design you want to test drive, or you’re unsure about the marketability of a card. Or perhaps you’re a newbie who isn’t sure if a card is up to a marketable standard. Anyone is welcome to participate. In fact, I encourage everyone to at least look at the cards in question and read the critique comments – you may learn something. The purpose of the clinic is to help artists improve the commercial appeal and marketability of their cards.

THE RULES

  • ONE card per artist only.
  • Card must be intended for sale at Greeting Card Universe.
  • To submit a card for critique, post a link to the card at GCU in the comments section of this clinic post. Allowances will be made if you’ve had a card declined, or made a new design you’d like advice on before submission. Give us the link where we can see the card, such as your private gallery, Flickr, Tinypic, etc. If you do give a private gallery link, be sure your private module gallery is ON. Please do not post links to your Manage Cards section – do you really want strangers tinkering with your cards? And please don’t ask us to critique a card that’s pending review – we can’t see it until it’s approved.
  • Any artist is free to comment and/or give a critique of a submitted card. HOWEVER, post-and-run comments like “great card” or “you suck” will not be tolerated, nor will abuse. Criticism should be constructive, not destructive. Play nice or you will be banned.
  • I also won’t tolerate temper tantrums if you decide your “artistic integrity” is being stepped on because you asked for a critique, and someone told you the photo you’re using isn’t in focus. If you can’t take honest criticism, don’t submit. Once gets you a warning; twice and you’re banned from submitting in the future.
  • Artists who critique may do so by giving their opinion, posting an example of another card, or pointing the submitter to a video, on-line article, or other helpful suggestion.
  • Don’t forget that artists who are giving you tips and helpful advice are volunteering their time and trouble. Be nice. A link back to their store on your website or blog is appreciated (but not mandatory).
  • You are free not to take any advice offered. There’s no guarantee any card will be a bestseller, so don’t come into the clinic with unrealistic expectations.
  • Rules may change as we go along and we see how things turn out, okay?

So without any further ado, I declare this week’s Critique Clinic open!

6 Comments leave one →
  1. artbymarion's avatar
    April 4, 2014 11:25 am

    I would like a critique on the photo. First time using a faded background. You can find the card here http://www.greetingcarduniverse.com/greeting-card-1266380/?aid=133078.

    Thanks in advance.

    PS second time I have posted this, when I posted the first time it just returned me to the article and no comment.

  2. GCUAdmin's avatar
    April 4, 2014 12:02 pm

    Sometimes I need to approve your post before it pops up.

    I’ll leave critique of the image to one of our photographers, who can give you better advice. What I will do is say that I think your design would look a lot better if “Easter Blessings” was in the same font as “From our house to yours.” The way the card is designed, there’s no good reason to use 2 fonts, and you’d get a much more cohesive look.

    Corrie

    • artbymarion's avatar
      April 4, 2014 12:20 pm

      Thanks Corrie for your quick reply and taking the time. I quite like the two different fonts and did it deliberately. I will consider what you are saying and may change it.

  3. GCUAdmin's avatar
    April 4, 2014 1:57 pm

    It’s your choice, I just don’t think those particular fonts work well together. From a visual standpoint, a script font works better paired with a plain font.

  4. Doreen/Salon of Art's avatar
    April 4, 2014 3:27 pm

    Hi Marion – first let me say I agree with Corrie in that the two fonts you’ve chosen are not well suited for each other. This may help: https://gcucommunity.com/2013/05/27/dash-of-inspiration-typography-font-combination/

    As far as the image: I would clone out the distracting white spot on the left. The image needs to be sharper which can be accomplished using good digital sharpening tools. Also, it needs more punch … pump up the saturation and contrast. You can achieve a feeling of increased saturation if you chose a lighter background color such as a ‘linen’ white vs the dreary yellowish hue which does not bring out the color in your image and in fact darkens the overall card.

    Overall it’s got potential, just needs some tweaks and polish to make it a winner 🙂

    Doreen
    http://www.SalonOfArt.com
    http://www.facebook.com/salonofart
    http://www.greetingcarduniverse.com/SalonOfArt

  5. artbymarion's avatar
    April 4, 2014 5:45 pm

    Thank you both for your time and answers. Doreen I have taken on board what you say about the photo and will try to liven it up. I also accept the point about the font – I don’t quite see it myself but two such experts cannot be argued with LOL.

    Thanks again.

Leave a reply to Doreen/Salon of Art Cancel reply