Skip to content

Blast From the Past: Leveraging Card Designs

February 17, 2012

This article first ran in the Newsletter on July 14, 2011

Applying a Little Leverage

Let’s talk about designing, shall we? Artists and photographers can spend hours working on one card design, getting it exactly right. The color, composition, design elements and text have to come together to make an appealing and attractive package.

You decide your design is perfect for a birthday card. You upload it, add some snazzy inner verse that’s quite clever, if you do say so yourself. And you sit back with a smile, waiting for the sales to roll in ‘cause that card’s clearly a winner.

But somehow, the sales don’t come. Or you sell one here and there. What’s the matter with shoppers, anyway? Don’t they see how brilliant your card is? Why aren’t they buying?

To get to the bottom of the conundrum, we’re going to have to touch on a delicate subject, one which has baffled, disgusted and riled artists since GCU’s beginnings. I’m talking about…repetitions.(cue dramatic crescendo)

Yes, those long, never ending, tedious lists of duplicate cards that pop up in the New Cards section. The same design, repeated over and over, the only difference being the age, relationship, or both. THOSE cards. You know what I mean.

A couple of the most asked questions from the GCU forum come to mind – “How can any artist possibly stand to do all that repetition?” and “How can customers stand to wade through all that repetition – it’s so boring!”

I’ll start with something which may not have occurred to some artists: Greeting Card Universe is a retail site meant to entice shoppers and fulfill their needs. I understand why artists might view 100+ cards of the same design with dismay, but shoppers don’t think that way, and they aren’t using the site the same as you are.

Very often, when shoppers come to GCU, they do so through a search for a specific kind of card, such as “happy 50th birthday to my uncle.”

When shoppers are browsing, they’ll often start with a specific category, then drill down as needed. For example, the other day I had a shopper buy a card after browsing Invitations >> Wedding Attendants/Bridal Party Invitations >> Be My Ring Bearer?

Your sales notifications can make interesting reading.

The beauty of GCU is that shoppers can have it any way they want it – they can do an off-site or on-site search for a specific card, or they can dig into categories and sub-categories until they find what they’re looking for, or a combination of both.

Another thing to note is that per the Big Kahunas at GCU, who presumably know best, shoppers hardly ever browse the New Cards section. It’s just us artists who can be a wee bit obsessive about it.

As to how artists can stand the mind-numbingly task of creating duplicate cards, the answer is simple: money. I make repetitious cards all the time. It’s boring. Believe me, I’d much rather be doing something else. But I keep myself going by thinking about sales and how much money I’ll make when shoppers buy my cards. It’s a powerful incentive, especially now that I have several years worth of data telling me that for me, specific cards outsell general cards by a significant margin.

Apparently, people like sending a “Happy Mother’s Day to my Birth Mom” card in lieu of a general Mother’s Day card, even when the designs are the same.

Don’t forget that when shoppers are either browsing by drilling down categories, or searching for a specific card, they rarely see duplicate content because all those repetitive cards are each in their own sub-categories. You see them in a big boring lump in New Cards, but in reality, they’re scattered across GCU’s categories list.

When I make a new design for a category like Father’s Day, I consider how best I can leverage that design to make it go as far as it can and work for me as much as possible. If appropriate, I make a general card + a series of relationship cards or age specific cards. I might also recycle that design for a totally different category, since by GCU’s rules, I can use the same design 3 times (age and relationship specific cards count as one use).

Do the work once, leverage it to work for you many times.

If you can’t bring yourself to do age and relationship specific and other repetitious cards, I understand. This isn’t for everyone. As I said, it’s a lot of work. However, if you feel like you can stand it, leveraging your designs could work for you.

P.S. – I’ve been told that UK card buyers prefer blank cards. There’s no reason you can’t include one blank card as one of your “three image use” designs. In fact, many artists already do that to cover all the bases.

Orphan Categories

February 15, 2012

Here’s a Newsletter article that first ran in October 2011:

Little Orphan Category

What’s an “orphan” category, you ask? It’s a category at Greeting Card Universe that contains few or no greeting cards. It’s a category that’s neglected. Unloved. Begging for attention.

And you should give those poor little orphan categories your attention. Know why? Because adopting an orphan category can lead to some very nice sales for you because you’ll have hardly any competition.

Here’s how it breaks down: in a popular category like, say, Birthday – General, you’re competing with thousands and thousands of other artists, some of them pretty heavy  hitters whose cards are well established. Some sub-categories, however, are wide open with very little competition. By focusing on those, I may be able to take advantage of my fellow artists’ lack of attention by designing cards to fit those neglected sub-categories.

It gets better, because sometimes you can find a whole CATEGORY that contains very few cards, and adopt that as your own. I did that not too long ago, and I’ve already sold a few hundred cards – and no, I’m not telling you which one ;-)

Most of us design generic cards suitable for a multitude of recipients, but in addition to that, if you want to see your artist commissions go up, you should be designing cards for specific specialty categories and sub-categories … and you should also be adopting those poor, lonely orphans while you’re at it.

Custom Corner: Sandra Rose Designs

February 14, 2012

From time to time, we like to bring you a story of a custom request and how it turned out. Here’s Sandra from Sandra Rose Designs – thanks!

_________________________

Custom requests create in me a little excitement and a bit of concern, depending on how busy I am at the moment. The day I opened my mailbox and saw the heading “Greeting Card Universe – GCU Custom Request # ” was no different. I had little time to work with the request that day, but I would be able to handle it in a couple of days. But of course, my interest and excitement took over, and I was eager to see what it was all about.

The initial details in the email request were sketchy. “I was wondering if you had any future daughter-in-law cards in yellow or green – these are her colors – also with an umbrella?” The card she was interested in was also pictured in the email with the product number to help give me a connection point for her need.
Original Card: “Product ID: 682958  The intended Order Quantity of 1”

There is a link in the email from GCU that says “Click here to access your Custom Card Requests” so that takes me to the location where our emails to each other can be accessed.

I emailed her right back and let her know that I would be happy to help her. I would be able to complete the changes in 2 days. Would that be acceptable to her? I would change the colors on the card for her from the original pink to a green and add some touches of yellow, and add “future daughter-in-law” on the front of the card for her. Was there a particular color of green that she had in mind? (I feel it is important to spell out exactly what we are agreeing on, so that we are on the same page.)

She responded to me (I receive all communication in my regular email, but can access it through the link that is always available to me) that the timeline was fine. This was a wedding shower for her future daughter-in-law, and that her colors were sage green and yellow, and the shower had the theme of umbrellas. She felt that my card with her colors would be perfect. I responded one more time with great – she would hear from me in 2 days with the card link where she could make her purchase.

I added it to my calendar for the appropriate day. When I began working on it, I researched on line the color sage green – in wedding sites to see exactly what she might be referring to. I quickly got the pulse for “sage green” and proceeded to change my color to a sage green. I brightened it up just a bit – because the sage was a bit “heavy” for a card. I liked it better. The spokes on the umbrella were already yellow, and I thought that was enough yellow. I liked the white hearts within the background of the card. I changed the front text to include the relationship. That was a lot more text than the original card, so I resized my umbrella to fit with the added text.

This is the card that resulted.

After I uploaded it, I emailed her back to let her know that the card was finished, and that when reviewed and approved by Greeting Card Universe, I would send her the link.

It was not a “private card” so I just uploaded it in the appropriate category, and within a few hours, it was approved and I sent her the link with instructions that she could make the purchase from this link along with any other card she might find. I also wished her luck with the shower and upcoming wedding and how special she must feel as the Mother of the Groom.

Before the day was through, the email came through that this card had been sold.

The important thing I always try to remember is that to a customer, we are the “face” of this huge universe of cards at GCU. It is a person to person contact, and clarity, friendliness, and professionalism will help to communicate well. I considered what she desired, and using my design skills and eye – work to create a card that suits their needs but also looks good to me, and meets my standards.

Good luck to all of you when you get that email that says: GCU Custom Request # …

Sandra Rose

Dash of Inspiration – Easter Egg Hunt

February 13, 2012

A Dash of Inspiration, A Cup of Creativity by Doreen

Easter Egg Hunt

It’s not too late to add a few Easter cards to your stores! Even though we are cutting it close, if you don’t get sales from your new Easter cards this year you’ll certainly be ready for next year 🙂  Keeping it simple this week with a focus on images to inspire Easter creations and some tools to get you started!

I always find it very inspirational to see how artists in different mediums convey their unique messages, in this case their Easter visions, so here is a link to Easter Art on Redbubble.

So, for those of you who have never attempted to create an Easter Egg in your design program, here are some tutorials to get you started.

PHOTOSHOP Tutorial by Sanja Soltic at CSSCreme

ILLUSTRATOR Tutorial by PeHaa at PEHAA’s Blog

PAINT SHOP PRO Tutorial by Nightshadow FX

GIMP Video Tutorial by GIMPTricks

Here’s a few goodies to add to your digital toolbox and remember; ALWAYS do your own research on CU TOU.  I try to offer only those items which are okay to use for our Greeting Card designs, BUT I don’t always have the time to dig deep enough.  So grab the items and read the terms!  Actual license TOU is often in the download file.

Okay so here ya go . . .

6 Free Easter Egg Shapes from Gaudi at Brusheezy

13 Hi-Res Photoshop Easter Eggs Brushes by PeHaa at Brusheezy

Easter Pattern from Pattern8.com

Easter Art DINGBAT Font by GemFonts

I hope to have inspired you to think outside the box for your Easter card creations!

Image by Sharon Bree

Critique Clinic – February 10-12, 2012

February 10, 2012

How does it work? For three days a week (Friday-Sunday midnight), I will open the clinic to any artist who wants an honest peer review and critique of a card which gets plenty of clicks but no sales, so something’s probably not quite right, or you’ve got a new design you want to test drive, or you’re unsure about the marketability of a card. Or perhaps you’re a newbie who isn’t sure if a recently submitted card is up to a marketable standard. Anyone is welcome to participate. In fact, I encourage everyone to at least look at the cards in question and read the critique comments – you may learn something. The purpose of the clinic is to help artists improve the commercial appeal and marketability of their cards.

THE RULES

  • ONE card per artist only.
  • Card must be for sale at Greeting Card Universe.
  • We will take an unlimited number of artists, including those who have submitted recently, HOWEVER I reserve the right to close a clinic for the day if the submissions become overwhelming. If the clinic has been closed, and you submit a card, your comment will be deleted.
  • To submit a card for critique, post a link to the card at GCU in the comments section of this clinic post. Allowances will be made if you’ve had a card declined, or made a new design you’d like advice on. Give us the link where we can see the card, such as your private gallery, Flickr, etc.
  • Any artist is free to comment and/or give a critique of a submitted card. HOWEVER, post-and-run comments like “great card” or “you suck” will not be tolerated, nor will abuse. Criticism should be constructive, not destructive. Play nice or you will be banned.
  • I also won’t tolerate temper tantrums if you decide your “artistic integrity” is being stepped on because you asked for a critique, and someone told you the photo you’re using isn’t in focus. If you can’t take honest criticism, don’t submit. Once gets you a warning; twice and you’re banned from submitting in the future.
  • Artists who critique may do so by giving their opinion, posting an example of another card, or pointing the submitter to a video, on-line article, or other helpful suggestion.
  • Don’t forget that artists who are giving you tips and helpful advice are volunteering their time and trouble. Be nice. A link back to their store on your website or blog is appreciated (but not mandatory).
  • You are free not to take any advice offered. There’s no guarantee any card will be a bestseller, so don’t come into the clinic with unrealistic expectations.
  • Rules may change as we go along and we see how things turn out, okay?

So without any further ado, I declare this week’s Critique Clinic open!

Contest: A Little Help From My Friends – Results!

February 9, 2012

The results are in on our Blog Carnival/Design Contest mash-up: A Little Help From My Friends!

Third Place: Laura J. Holman with 12 votes

Second Place: Doreen Erhardt with 28 votes

First Place: Sri Devi with 47 votes

Congratulations to Sri (and to Susan Alison, whose card she submitted)! Each artist wins a $10 Amazon gift certificate or 5 free card credits!

So here’s a quickie poll you can all participate in: Should we continue having Design Contests or not – what’s your opinion?

Guest Post: Fair Use and Copyright

February 8, 2012

Armed with Knowledge: Understanding Fair Use

By Guest Blogger: Sun At Night

Any artist can discover that their visual has been used without their permission or license. This can happen at any time, in any place and in any form. The organization or individual may claim that they have the right to use the images under the Fair Use doctrine. What is fair use and what does it mean?

In the U.S. the copyright laws include a limitation of use without permission or licensing of copyrighted material. The use of a reproduction of a particular work without permission of the copyright holder is allowed and not considered an infringement under the Fair Use doctrine. The use may be considered fair when it is used for educational purposes such as teaching or research. Other instances of fair use are:  commentary, news, and criticism. The Fair Use doctrine applies to video, audio, text, and imagery.

Under the umbrella of fair use, libraries are able to offer photocopies of book pages. Search engines are able to offer lower quality thumbnails of images for research purposes and bloggers may post images for criticism or commentary. Teachers may incorporate images into curriculum for educational purposes. After all, where would artists be without visual examples of photography or art in the classroom? What fair use does not cover are commercial purposes.

In a real world example an artist incorporates an image from a photographer’s web site (without permission) into their blog. The image used was not pertinent to the blogger’s works of art. The blog post did not comment on the image nor was it mentioned in anyway. The image was simply incorporated for visual appeal. The blog post was simply to keep fans, customers, and patrons informed that the blogger’s new second art studio was coming along nicely. This is an advertisement promoting or marketing the new secondary studio. In this case the artist blogger is unable to claim fair use due to the advertisement being a commercial purpose.

The copyright code has four factors that are considered in determining that a use of the material in question is fair. The four factors are:

  • The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes.
  • The nature of the copyrighted work.
  • The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole.
  • The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.

The third factor above regarding the amount or portion used is not quantified by law. There are industry standards though. The rule of thumb is any copyrighted material that is used equals over 10 percent of the original may be considered too much. In the case of imagery whether it is photography or art the rule of thumb is that the total is no more than 5 images from a single artist. Online educators are given these industry standards for incorporating copyrighted material into their curriculum:

  • Motion media (video) – allowable up to 10% or 3 minutes whichever is less.
  • Text material – up to 10% or 1000 words whichever is less.
  • Music, lyrics, music video – up to 10% but no more than 30 seconds.
  • Imagery including art or photography – no more than 5 images from an artist or 15 works from a published collective work.

Other industry guidelines are time related. The most common recommendation for teachers who use copyrighted works under the Fair Use doctrine is to do so for a limited time. Online and classroom instructors are recommended to incorporate the copyrighted material into curriculum based instruction and conference presentations for a 15 day availability period. After 15 days the copyrighted material can be put in reserve or archives for 2 years. After the two year period permission from the copyright holder should be obtained. Remember these are just guidelines and can differ amongst organizations.

Artist’s Actions

Artist’s need to think about and consider fair use laws when dealing with copyright infringements. While this sounds like common sense it is now a legal consideration. Why?  In 2008 the U.S. court ruled that “failure to consider fair use when sending a DMCA notice could give rise to a claim of failing to act in good faith.” (Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., 572 F. Supp 2d 1150 (N.D. Cal. 2008).)

Here are some corrective actions that artists can take when dealing with potential copyright infringements; it also ensures that the artist has done their due diligence:

  1. Double check licensing records. This includes verifying sales or lack of licenses with any stock agencies.
  2. Consider Fair Use Laws – consider any probable claims of fair use.
  3. Make sure that elements in question qualify for copyright.
  4. Check the quantity of the material in question.
  5. Check the WhoIs registry – discover what countries are involved.  U.S. Copyright laws are only applicable in the U.S. This includes the DMCA take down notice.
  6. Contact the potential infringer in writing requesting the removal of the material in question. Keep documentation and obtain screen captures identifying potential infringements.
  7. File a DMCA Notice if needed. Only the copyright holder or a designated agent may file.
  8. Consult a copyright lawyer when you feel it is necessary.

Why is due diligence important when filing a DMCA notice? There are penalties for filing a false DMCA notice. Due diligence is simply taking reasonable steps to satisfy legal requirements. In relation to the good faith phrase regarding the DMCA notices it is wise to be armed with knowledge.

Additional Reading

Article from Plagiarism Today: When Not to File a DMCA Notice

Article summaries from Stanford SULAIR: Copyright and Fair Use

Copyright Duration Diagram from Public Domain Sherpa

Copyright.gov – Copyright Code Flyer – FL-102

Design Spotlight: Vicki Ferrari

February 7, 2012

Today’s Design Spotlight is on artist Vicki Ferrari of Vicki Ferrari Photography

_________________________

I have been taking photographs professionally since the early 1980’s, with the use of both manual SLR’s (be it film or transparency) and medium format cameras. I also worked on Hamilton Island in Queensland, Australia in the early 90’s, where I worked as the Island Photographer, having the time of my life, working with people on places like the Reef, at Whitehaven Beach and on Hayman Island.

Photography has always been my life and passion. This is demonstrated in all my work, be it a portrait or wedding photography or creative photography, art and design.

My signature style is that I have the ability to create many different artistic styles, not just one particular genre. My work has always reflected this ability but never more since the exciting discovery of digital art and design, which I found shortly after making the transition to digital photography in 2004. And loving it!

I have managed to combine my love of the Australian bush, spiritual beliefs, quotes and of the Australian Outback and this is expressed clearly in my body of work.

Faith, Love, Trust is a card for motivation and encouragement. The model is my lovely furry boy, Sully!! He is so purrfectly sweet but then I am biased, of course!!

Dash of Inspiration – A Piece of the Action

February 6, 2012

A Dash of Inspiration, A Cup of Creativity by Doreen

A Piece of the Action

I saw an article on action photography related to performing arts and it inspired me . . . to inspire you!  So this week we’ll chat about capturing movement in photography.  For about ten years, I had the pleasurable experience of being a member of a group that offered constructive critiquing for the Photographic Society of America.  We saw all types of subjects, but the ones that were usually the most disturbing were the amateur attempts at motion capture.

There are specific techniques, which are not difficult, but do require some practice to create an image like those in Angie Bowen’s Showcase of Photography in Action at Noupe.com.  I saw so many photographs where the photographer would so proudly state ‘the blur is intentional, I was showing motion’, yet the entire image was blurry.  This type of photograph does not show motion, a blurry photograph is nothing more than a blurry photograph.  My Photography Tip for June/July of 2010 was on Motion Capture, so I’ve offered the link to that below for those of you who are interested in learning more about the techniques.

Motion Capture Photography by Doreen Erhardt

I also thought I’d offer some great examples of cards on GCU which have really well-done motion capture photographs:

This image from Sandra Rose is really well done.  Notice how well she captured the movement of the puppy by keeping that cute little fur ball in sharp focus and letting the surroundings wiz by to give us the feeling of motion?

This photograph by Claire Shearer is terrific example of the Motion Blur technique I refer to in my article.  The movement is shown in the lines of light created by a train or traffic moving through during exposure, yet the building in the background and those above the source of the motion remain sharply focused.

In this beautiful example by Noelle Lorraine, she’s captured the moment of these precious little girls doing ‘patty-cake’ by stopping the action.  When we look at this photograph, we know the children were in motion at the time  based purely on the position of their hands & bodies; and their expressions.  This a a perfect example of Stopping Motion.

So, I hope that I’ve inspired some of you to try some new techniques and to better understand what a good motion capture photograph looks like!

Critique Clinic – February 3-5, 2012

February 3, 2012

How does it work? For three days a week (Friday-Sunday midnight), I will open the clinic to any artist who wants an honest peer review and critique of a card which gets plenty of clicks but no sales, so something’s probably not quite right, or you’ve got a new design you want to test drive, or you’re unsure about the marketability of a card. Or perhaps you’re a newbie who isn’t sure if a recently submitted card is up to a marketable standard. Anyone is welcome to participate. In fact, I encourage everyone to at least look at the cards in question and read the critique comments – you may learn something. The purpose of the clinic is to help artists improve the commercial appeal and marketability of their cards.

THE RULES

  • ONE card per artist only.
  • Card must be for sale at Greeting Card Universe.
  • We will take an unlimited number of artists, including those who have submitted recently, HOWEVER I reserve the right to close a clinic for the day if the submissions become overwhelming. If the clinic has been closed, and you submit a card, your comment will be deleted.
  • To submit a card for critique, post a link to the card at GCU in the comments section of this clinic post. Allowances will be made if you’ve had a card declined, or made a new design you’d like advice on. Give us the link where we can see the card, such as your private gallery, Flickr, etc.
  • Any artist is free to comment and/or give a critique of a submitted card. HOWEVER, post-and-run comments like “great card” or “you suck” will not be tolerated, nor will abuse. Criticism should be constructive, not destructive. Play nice or you will be banned.
  • I also won’t tolerate temper tantrums if you decide your “artistic integrity” is being stepped on because you asked for a critique, and someone told you the photo you’re using isn’t in focus. If you can’t take honest criticism, don’t submit. Once gets you a warning; twice and you’re banned from submitting in the future.
  • Artists who critique may do so by giving their opinion, posting an example of another card, or pointing the submitter to a video, on-line article, or other helpful suggestion.
  • Don’t forget that artists who are giving you tips and helpful advice are volunteering their time and trouble. Be nice. A link back to their store on your website or blog is appreciated (but not mandatory).
  • You are free not to take any advice offered. There’s no guarantee any card will be a bestseller, so don’t come into the clinic with unrealistic expectations.
  • Rules may change as we go along and we see how things turn out, okay?

So without any further ado, I declare this week’s Critique Clinic open!