Skip to content

Critique Clinic – January 6-8, 2012

January 6, 2012

How does it work? For three days a week (Friday-Sunday midnight), I will open the clinic to any artist who wants an honest peer review and critique of a card which gets plenty of clicks but no sales, so something’s probably not quite right, or you’ve got a new design you want to test drive, or you’re unsure about the marketability of a card. Or perhaps you’re a newbie who isn’t sure if a recently submitted card is up to a marketable standard. Anyone is welcome to participate. In fact, I encourage everyone to at least look at the cards in question and read the critique comments – you may learn something. The purpose of the clinic is to help artists improve the commercial appeal and marketability of their cards.

THE RULES

  • ONE card per artist only.
  • Card must be for sale at Greeting Card Universe.
  • We will take an unlimited number of artists, including those who have submitted recently, HOWEVER I reserve the right to close a clinic for the day if the submissions become overwhelming. If the clinic has been closed, and you submit a card, your comment will be deleted.
  • To submit a card for critique, post a link to the card at GCU in the comments section of this clinic post.
  • Any artist is free to comment and/or give a critique of a submitted card. HOWEVER, post-and-run comments like “great card” or “you suck” will not be tolerated, nor will abuse. Criticism should be constructive, not destructive. Play nice or you will be banned.
  • I also won’t tolerate temper tantrums if you decide your “artistic integrity” is being stepped on because you asked for a critique, and someone told you the photo you’re using isn’t in focus. If you can’t take honest criticism, don’t submit. Once gets you a warning; twice and you’re banned from submitting in the future.
  • Artists who critique may do so by giving their opinion, posting an example of another card, or pointing the submitter to a video, on-line article, or other helpful suggestion.
  • Don’t forget that artists who are giving you tips and helpful advice are volunteering their time and trouble. Be nice. A link back to their store on your website or blog is appreciated (but not mandatory).
  • You are free not to take any advice offered. There’s no guarantee any card will be a bestseller, so don’t come into the clinic with unrealistic expectations.
  • Rules may change as we go along and we see how things turn out, okay?

So without any further ado, I declare this week’s Critique Clinic open!

11 Comments leave one →
  1. Joann's avatar
    January 6, 2012 8:05 am

    Hi, I know one of the rules is that a card must be for sale at GCU. This one was submitted and declined but I want to improve on it from what the reviewer said and the re-submit. It has sold several times on zazzle and if you decide to let me submit this for review, here’s the link as well as what the reviewer said. Thank you:)

    Thank you for submitting this artwork to GCU however we’re sorry that your submission has not met our Marketability Standards and has been declined due to the following reason: Poor image. This image has poor composition: bad angle, out-of-focus tail, the missing paws, seated position, table visible. The idea is good but the image isn’t marketable.

    http://www.zazzle.com/bad_day_cat_humor_card-137512399910989388

    • GCUAdmin's avatar
      January 6, 2012 8:24 am

      Hi, Joann, that’s okay about breaking the rule… we’re happy to help with designs that have been declined by GCU.

      I can’t personally speak to any technical errors – I leave that up to the photographers among us. I can tell you that I find the composition kind of odd and unappealing to my eye. The colors all tend to blend together as well, I don’t think there’s enough contrast. I’m not sure what you can do about improvements to the original picture. Maybe someone else will have some advice for you.

      Corrie

    • Doreen/Salon of Art's avatar
      January 6, 2012 4:15 pm

      Hi Joann,

      I’m afraid I have to agree with the reviewers from a technical aspect. It’s just not professional to have large blurry areas in a photograph unless it has been done creatively to 1) throw the background out of focus or 2) show movement of a subject without showing movement from the camera or surrounding elements.

      It is a darling idea, but I just don’t see what you can do to improve the technical aspects of this image.

      Doreen
      http://www.SalonOfArt.com

      • Joann's avatar
        January 7, 2012 4:39 am

        Thanks Doreen, I guess I just a little biased when it comes to photos of Misty…lol:)

  2. Joann's avatar
    January 6, 2012 10:05 am

    Thanks for your input Corrie…I’ve had half my friends love this and half find the comp unappealing. I think I may try a few different crops and backgrounds and see what comes out of it. Again…thank you:))

  3. Donna Collins's avatar
    January 6, 2012 3:24 pm

    http://www.greetingcarduniverse.com/holiday-cards/easter-cards/religious/blessings/happy-easter-girl-in-garden-890502?aid=156115

    Here is one of my cards that I made for Easter…which was also a Birthday…Just wondering if this simple card is o.k. for Easter too.

    Thanks,
    Donna Collins

    • GCUAdmin's avatar
      January 6, 2012 3:41 pm

      Hmmm… to be honest, when I think of Easter, I’m thinking more eggs and bunnies than a butterfly. There just aren’t enough elements on the card that say “Easter” to me. Maybe you could bring Easter a little more into it by doing something with the inner verse, such as including “Easter bonnet” in there somehow? I suggest this because the woman is wearing a hat.

      Corrie

  4. CindyJ's avatar
    January 6, 2012 4:42 pm

    Here’s one that I thought I might have submitted for review in the past, but I spent the last half hour browsing through the previous clinics (fun, by the way – lol), but couldn’t find this one. So, I’m submitting it now (if I did submit it to a previous clinic, I apologize). It has had 428 clicks but only 2 sales and those were both to me. LOL!

    http://artist.greetingcarduniverse.com/collections/digital-art/youre-thirteen-thats-like-a-840371

    Thanks!
    Cindy

    • Doreen Erhardt's avatar
      January 8, 2012 6:40 pm

      Hi Cindy,

      Well, here is my opinion. There are times when combining clip-art with photography blends well and there are times when it doesn’t, unfortunately I think in this case it just doesn’t. The photograph of the kitten, though cute appears to be of very poor quality; the tonal values and color on the kitten are poor and there is noise in the kitten photo. These issues are even more notable when set along side the brightly colored clip art. So, though your idea is very good and obviously draws attention, the execution of the idea just isn’t what people expect to see when they click on it to see a larger version.

      Doreen
      http://www.SalonOfArt.com

      • CindyJ's avatar
        January 9, 2012 4:35 am

        Thank you very much for your honest critique, Doreen. It’s what I needed to hear. 🙂 I truly do appreciate good photography, but unfortunately, I seem unable to be objective when it comes to photographs for my own cards (my daughter took that picture, by the way). Hopefully I’ll be able to overcome that bias someday. In the meantime, I think I’ll lay off the photos (in my cards) for awhile. 🙂

        Thank you again, Doreen, for taking the time to enlighten me. 🙂 I’ll leave that card in my store for a little while so that people who read this thread can gain some insight (if they want to look at it); but eventually I will probably delete it.

        Very gratefully,
        Cindy

Leave a reply to Salon of Art Cancel reply